
I think it is unclear as to whether Barack Obama has an electoral mandate. While it is clear he was elected to change course and policies from the Bush administration, Obama should be aware that Americans have been historically unwilling to adopt a left wing, liberal agenda.
Upon researching for this blog, I read an excellent piece in the "Fundamentals of Interactive Journalism" blog by Michael Preston. He argues that, "Barack Obama better tread carefully. I’m sure that he will. He’s a cautious man, which is one reason that he is now the 44th President of the United States. But if people like Mr. Meacham start to get antsy if Obama does begin to move the country leftward, make sure you show them the numbers from above so they understand what a mandate looks like."
Fundamentals of Interactive Journalism Source
Preston's argument is that although Barack Obama scored impressive totals in the election, in terms of popular vote, states won, and demographics, he has to be careful and cautious about moving the country too far left because America is essentially a center-right country.
Preston's article came on the back of an article in Newsweek written by Jon Meacham titled : "America remains a center-right nation—a fact that a President Obama would forget at his peril."
A great point made by Meacham is that both Republican and Democratic candidates eventually move towards the center in American politics. He writes, "Republican presidents, too, are frequently pulled from the right to the center. Nixon instituted wage and price controls and created the Environmental Protection Agency. Reagan cut taxes, then increased them, presided over the expansion of the federal government and wound up successfully negotiating with what he had once called the Evil Empire. George H.W. Bush swore he would not raise taxes, but did."
These are two excellent examples, in particular the last point about George H.W. Bush saying he would not raise taxes... only to go ahead and do so. This brings me to my point that politicians should not be completely subservient to their party's interests or their so called "electoral mandate". I believe Presidents should be able to adapt to different conditions and changing your mind and or policies is not such a bad thing because, let's face it, the world changes frequently. Socialism used to be a "dirty word" in the United States of America, but today, companies left right and center are begging for government intervention - was any of this imaginable 2 or 3 years ago? Not a chance. But today, it is becoming the norm.
Finally, on the Meacham article, he argues that although America is a centrist country, it is a centrist country that tilts to the right. He argues, "So are we a centrist country, or a right-of-center one? I think the latter, because the mean to which most Americans revert tends to be more conservative than liberal. According to the NEWSWEEK Poll, nearly twice as many people call themselves conservatives as liberals (40 percent to 20 percent), and Republicans have dominated presidential politics—in many ways the most personal, visceral vote we cast—for 40 years. Since 1968, Democrats have won only three of 10 general elections (1976, 1992 and 1996), and in those years they were led by Southern Baptist nominees who ran away from the liberal label. "Is this a center-right country? Yes, compared to Europe or Canada it's obviously much more conservative," says Adrian Wooldridge, coauthor of "The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America" and Washington bureau chief of the London-based Economist. "There's a much higher tolerance for inequality, much greater cultural conservatism, a higher incarceration rate, legalized handguns and greater distrust of the state."
Link to Newsweek article
Added to the results of the NEWSWEEK poll, in which nearly twice as many people call themselves conservatives as liberals (40 percent to 20 percent), I have personal experience of living in Europe. Europeans are much more liberal than Americans (on average), Europeans have universal, government funded healthcare, and in many European nations the government will pay for your education all the way to PHD level. But it is not just those facts that distinguish Europe from the United States in a liberal vain, it is the mindset as well. There is a stronger liberal mindset in Europe, more collective, and more socialist than the United States. Maybe America's fear of going too far left comes from the days of taxation without representation ; which eventually led to the revolutionary war. Whatever the case, as someone who has lived in 4 different European countries and 3 different American states, I wholeheartedly agree with Adrian Wooldridge about Europe being more liberal than the USA.
In conclusion, I think I have accurately displayed that although Barack Obama won a decisive victory in the 2008 election, he will have to tread carefully as Americans are historically nervous and fearful of a left wing, liberal agenda. His electoral mandate is clear, a vast number of people wanted a change from the Bush years, but if he pounds the liberal drum too hard he could ruin his chances of re-election in 2012.
You certainly make some interesting points, however, I think it will take a bit more than an excessively liberal agenda for Obama to lose in 2012. Something along the lines of the country plunging into a full blown depression or perhaps a major foreign policy gaffe. Besides, the Republicans are a mess right now and have no clear direction or voice. At this point, Jindal would be the most dynamic potential Republican candidate, but if the economy recovers sufficiently it will not matter who the Republicans run. In that case, it would be wasteful to run Jindal.
ReplyDeleteI tend to agree with you, I don't really classify myself as a liberal or a republican, but I would like to see Obama move on some important issues like Social Security, Medicare, and education. I'd like to see more politicians put their political career on the line in order to stand up in what they believe in, in that sense, I hope Obama is not just another regular average joe politician.
ReplyDeleteGood points made, however, the country IS prone to adopting a "left-wing" agenda. Such issues as equal pay, civil rights, voter right, racial equality, labor laws, union protection, education funding are all examples of a "left-wing" agenda that had been passed/reformed by a Democratic president.
ReplyDeleteThe argument that we live in a "center-right" country is shaky at best. Based merely on the fact that Republicans have a higher probability of voting, mixed with a higher participation in punditry, may be the basis for this argument. But when looking at who the voters send to Congress may counter that argument. The House has been under control of the Democrats (with the exception of 1995-2007) since the early 1950's. On a micro-political level, the voters tend to elect Democrats to represent them (when looking at tighter individual districts, excluding the "at-large" voting of Senate candidates.
I agree with you, bsavage, however, I think that Obama still needs to tread carefully in as of much he should not shut the Repbulicans out completely from his decision making. We saw what happened when George Bush did this in 2006; the democrats swept back into power, and the opposite was the case in 1994 - Bill Clinton ran too far to the left and subsequently Newt Gingrich came to prominence. Let's hope Obama can unite rather than divide the electorate. Hopefully history will not repeat itself.
ReplyDeleteObama marks the end of the Burke Maritan Buckley model of conservatism based on collectivist labor unions, police suppression of the Bill of Rights, middle class subsidies for homes and schools under the watchful eye of the Knights of Columbus and Opus D. Every American boom has been caused by an Evangelical Revival and every major Depression by the domination of new Catholic immigrants. See for example George Marlin's history of the conservative party in New York or Paul Johnson's Modern Times, extolling the rise of Carolignianism of Adenauer, de Gaulle, and Gaspieri, forgetting that Hitler, too, was Carolignian and a Catholic altar boy. Carolignian Brzezinski spawned Zia al Haq, Khomeini, and bin Laden - breaks up superpowers via Aztlan and Kosovo as per Joel Garreau's Nine Nations. Brzezinski, Buckley and Buchanan winked anti-Semitic votes for Obama, delivered USA to Pope's feudal basket of Bamana Republics. Michael Pfleger and Joe Biden prove Obama is the Pope's boy. Obama is half a Kearney from County Offaly in Ireland. Talal got Pontifical medal as Fatima mandates Catholic-Muslim union against Jews (Francis Johnson, Great Sign, 1979, p. 126), Catholic Roger Taney wrote Dred Scott decision. John Wilkes Booth, Tammany Hall and Joe McCarthy were Catholics. Now Catholic majority Supreme Court. Catholics Palmisano, Grasso, Damato, Langone, Dioguardi, Palmieri destroyed American industry. Subprime construction mobsters had hookers deliver mortgages to banks. McCain's Keeting started it all. They find American cars too advanced to use or their mechanics to fix. Their slovenly, anti-intellectual work ethic produces vacuous, casuistrous blather and a tangle of contradictory regulations. NYC top drop outs: Hispanic 32%, Black 25%, Italian 20%. NYC top illegals: Ecuadorean, Italian, Polish. Ate glis-glis but blamed plague on others, now lettuce coli. Their bigotry most encouraged terror yet they reap most security funds. Rabbi circumcises lower, Pope upper brain. Tort explosion by glib casuistry. Hollywood Joe Kennedy had Bing Crosby proselytise.Bazelya 1992 case proves PLO-IRA-KLA links. Our enemy is the Peking-Mecca-Vatican Axis and the only answer is alliance with Israel and India.
ReplyDelete